Saturday, January 30, 2010

Medjugorje... a place of hope and peace

by Fr Paddy Byrne

For over 20 years, thousands of Irish people continue to make pilgrimage to a tiny village in a mountainous and remote part of Bosnia in search of something that, when discovered, is truly wonderful.

Medjugorje, for so many, is not just a place. It is a way of life.

It tells so many stories of human conversion, healing, forgiveness and most importantly brings God’s people to a place of peace. A peace celebrated by thousands of addicts who now live lives freed from the chains of addiction because of a spirituality that builds inner confidence and renews faith and hope in life.

Medjugorje began with the story of young people who claimed to have had a real experience with the Mother of God.

As they shared their experiences, millions of pilgrims throughout the world every year travel to Medjugorge in search of its fruits and to experience its greatest gift – a sense of peace and hope in life.

Ever the subject of debate, this contentious site of mystery and prayer continues to be controversial. The Church continues to observe and reflect on what is a place of prayer and sign of resurrection. I have visited Medjugorje many times and I have always benefited greatly as a result.

Medjugorje points us to our God, present and available to us wherever we find ourselves to be. Perhaps one of the greatest fruits is the joy that millions of people discover when they experience true reconciliation in this place. It is in the letting go of hurts and wounds that are often buried and alive in all our stories that so many are afforded with a renewed sense of opportunity and enthusiasm of life.

The simplicity of life in this very poor place offers pilgrims an invitation to avail of the wealth of God’s presence in abundance.

Life is difficult, it is not easy and so many are overwhelmed and burdened. God seeks us out, not where we are comfortable and in control; instead our God visits us in the places where we are wounded and broken.

This is the spirituality of Medjugorge, a way of life that offers renewal every day when we focus on our own poverty and acknowledge in the midst of all our limitations our God is available as a source of nourishment and sustenance.

Personal conversion is our life journey. That is, an inner movement that connects us deeper to our God. There are many fruits associated with Medjugorge, the late Pope John Paul II called it the “confessional of the world” when he considered the importance of reconciliation in all our lives.

Many young addicts now are living lives of contentment and fulfillment because of a real encounter with God’s love. Medjugorje is the home of the Cenacalo communities that accompany, through prayer and fellowship, young people whose lives were once destroyed by addiction to harmful substances.

The testimonies of healing and recovery by these good people are truly inspirational and life giving. In a time when so many are struggling and are burdened I think of this great gift given to inspire and heal.

adapted from The Laois Nationalist

The Cross at Medjugorje

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Wake up... it’s snowing!

Yesterday, Medjugorje woke up to a blanket of snow, an unusual event for this area. Pictured above we see “Our Lady of the Snows” at the site of the Blue Cross at the foot of Apparition Hill; while, below, sisters from the Community of the Beatitudes take a break from normal activities to enjoy the fun of the snow.
photos courtesy of Sr Teresia, Community of the Beatitudes.

Cilic bows out to Murray

Britain’s Andy Murray made a slow start in his semi-final match today against Medjugorje’s Marin Cilic, but eventually powered through to the final of the Australian Open Tennis Championship, winning by three sets to one.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

New Belgian Primate, a Medjugorje pilgrim...

Just over a week ago, Msgr André-Joseph Léonard was appointed Archbishop of Brussels by Pope Benedict XVI, on January 18, 2010, and so became Primate of Belgium.

When he was first made a bishop in 1991, Msgr Léonard added the name Mutien to his first name, in honour of his brother. On becoming Archbishop of Mechlen-Brussles he changed the name Mutien to Joseph, in honour of St Joseph, patron saint of Belgium.

Archbishop Léonard was born in May 1940 and is one of four brother who all became priests. He was ordained a priest in July 1964. Twenty years later he made his first ever visit to Medjugojre. On a second visit to Medjugorje when he was bishop of the Belgian city Namur, Msgr Léonard gave this interview to the late Fr Slavko Barbaric OFM which was published in the Medjugorje parish magazine Glas Mira:

Bishop Mutien: “I met Medjugorje through my seminarians. When I was rector of the school of theology at St Paul in Louvain-la-Neuve, 1982 and 1983; some of my students of theology went to Medjugorje. That was at the very beginning of the apparitions. I had never heard it spoken of before. Some students of theology came to me seeking permission to go to Medjugorje during their vacation. I knew nothing about it and I asked them if there existed a position of the Church on Medjugorje. They told me no, that it had only begun a few years earlier, and that the Virgin seemed to be appearing there. They gave me an article to read and I told them, “Go and see, go and see!” They spoke to me several times about it and in 1984 I decided myself to go and see. Four of us priests came with the students of theology to Medjugorje in June1984. I must say that what I saw in the parish church in 1984, that folk piety, the manner in which the rosary was prayed, the Eucharist celebrated, the meeting that I had with the visionaries two times during the “apparitions” in the sacristy – all that seemed to me very positive, especially the manner in which they prayed here.

SB: How many times have you already come to Medjugorje?

Bishop Mutien: This is my second time. The first time, then, I came in 1984. I kept a very positive impression about what I saw here. Later I kept informed. I read the books of Fr Laurentin, not all, but a few. I read some articles and , accordingly, took an interest. Especially while I was a professor at Louvain, I saw among the students some who had been to Medjugorje and who there had discovered prayer, confession, Eucharist, fasting, and I remember that in the theologate I began fasting Fridays quite regularly, following the example of some of my students of theology or other students who I met at the university and who had fasted after pilgrimage to Medjugorje. When I became a bishop I met some believers of my diocese who fasted every Friday, who discovered the sacraments, thanks to their encounter with Medjugorje.

I established the fact that regularly among the students of theology there were those who experienced conversion and received a vocation, thanks to Medjugorje. Now I have thirty students of theology, among whom there are some who have undergone a spiritual experience here which has marked their vocation. Such fruits are of interest to me. I know that from false premises according to logic we can draw exact conclusions. But still, the fact that so many positive discoveries take place, just with thanks to Medjugorje, is positive evidence in favor of Medjugorje. Accordingly, I continued to inform myself and said that some day I would be able also to return to Medjugorje.

In the year 2000 I thought I might be able to take advantage of the Jubilee for a short pilgrimage. The fact that at the present time in France and in Belgium there exists much opposition to the Medjugorje events, books which criticise Medjugorje, moved me to come and see with my own eyes. I do not wish to judge things, situations, and persons from a distance, only from books. I would rather take a little more personal look. After I informed the bishop of Mostar about my coming, I came here as a pilgrim to pray, but also personally to convince myself, and I must say that what I see in the parish church on the pastoral level seems very good: praying the rosary, the Eucharist, adoration, solid devotion, balanced piety, cultivated devotion.

As far as the Medjugorje events are concerned, it is not up to me to decide about that. It up to the local bishop, the bishops of Bosnia-Hercegovina, after a detailed study of the situation, to formulate a judgment about the authenticity or non-authenticity of the apparitions. That is not my business! In every case, I will accept the official judgment of the Church.

SB: Why does the Church hesitate when good fruits are visible?

Bishop Mutien: I think that the Church in her wisdom, with these kind of phenomena, wishes first to investigate the facts, and only then the fruits. I think that is the rule that Cardinal Seper already formulated when he was prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. First the facts are studied, and only then the fruits. Investigating the fruits is not enough. The facts have to be investigated, but the abundance of positive fruits is in itself a positive evidence, even if it seems to me that there are, as in every human affair, also negative fruits. Wherever there are people, there are also human moments, sometimes far too human. As also among the twelve apostles...

SB: From where does the opposition come?

Bishop Mutien: I understand why questions are asked about the phenomena of Medjugorje and why there exist objections against the apparitions in Medjugorje. I understand why, for example, questions like these are asked: the multitude of apparitions, the fact that in some manner they are foreseen, known for a certain day. I understand why there is opposition. Personally there are not many a priori thoughts about what the Most Blessed Virgin would need, or what she would not need to do. I prefer to accept things, even if they disturb my personal ideas, but I understand why questions are asked and I believe that, according to what I have been able to see, there are in this phenomenon of Medjugorje essential things, but there are also parasites.

I believe there exists that which is fundamental, but also accidentals. One is more positive, and the other is more negative. In Lourdes the testimony of Bernadette impressed me very much, I would say 100% pure. It seems to me that here there were parasites surrounding the central events. I understand why questions are asked. I keep informed also on the questions that the opponents of Medjugorje are asking. One has to hear them, and therefore I read the book of Joachim Boufflet from beginning to end. It is written in a polemical tone which does not seem to me to be in place, but there are real questions which are asked and which one day have to receive a clear and historically established answer. Accordingly, I accept those questions, but I wish to stay open to the event.

I know bishop friends whose rule of behavior is to say: “Look out, if we are open to the events of Medjugorje, we can perhaps encourage something that is not authentic.” There exists a risk. I am more sensitive to the opposite risk and say: “Just the same, it is possible that Heaven has spoken to people at that place and I do not wish to take the risk of a priori being closed to that grace.” Two risks exist: the risk that we are being deceived in Medjugorje and the risk that we are bypassing a gift of grace.

SB: A gift from Heaven?

Bishop Mutien: My desire is that those who have the grace and the competence for that, the local bishop, the Bishops’ Conference of Bosnia-Hercegovina, a theological and investigative commission, continue to study this phenomenon, to formulate one day the judgment of the Church about what has happened here. Until then, between the two risks, I prefer to take the risk of being open rather than the risk of a priori being closed to the grace of God which can be operating in this place. Accordingly, therefore, I take the position of openness and prudence.

SB: Some say: “Where there is prayer, there is grace and miracles.”

Bishop Mutien: That logic does not seem to me completely correct. It is true that there where there is prayer, Eucharist, confessions, fruits do come. But there are many other places in the world where there is prayer, where there is confession, where Eucharist is celebrated, but there are not the same kind of evident fruits!

SB: You, then, think that this dimension can be attributed to the apparitions?

Bishop Mutien: I believe that it is an indication which has to be studied, an indication that leads to consideration. I regularly meet young people who think about the priesthood or who have had a profound experience of conversion coming here, much more so than in relation to other places and that makes me question. I cannot accept without reservation that the fruits of Medjugorje are connected only with the living of the sacraments. They are also lived in other places. Here there exists something that presents a special question. It is not up to me to pronounce about the reality of these fundamentals, but there is a question that cannot be avoided.

SB: Finally, is it your wish to give some message here to the world?

Bishop Mutien: I think that on the spiritual plane we are living in a period that demands urgency. I am convinced, as is also Pope John Paul II, that the time of the Jubilee is a time of special grace, as John Paul II has said several times, that is preparing a new outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the Church. That which I am expecting from Medjugorje is that it contribute to the preparation of that new outpouring of the Holy Spirit which the Church and world need. Therefore I think that it is more useful to concentrate on the most fundamental, as you are doing here in this parish: to concentrate on the Eucharist which is the source of Christian life, and for the rest I think we need to cultivate the grace of peace and seek for the discernment in connection with Medjugorje to be done in the best possible climate, for the good of the Church.

“Miracle” from Medjugorje

by Selma Milovanovic

They call him the “miracle of Medjugorje'” but tennis star Marin Cilic is not what his home town is most famous for.

The small hilltop community in Bosnia and Herzegovina is where the Virgin Mary is said to have repeatedly appeared to six people since 1981. Medjugorje has since been visited by millions of pilgrims.

It's a world away from Melbourne Park but like any other proud parents, Koviljka and Zdenko Cilic have spent the past 10 days waking up at all hours to follow their son's journey to the semi-final of the Australian Open.

As giant-killer Cilic, who disposed of Andy Roddick on Tuesday, prepares for a duel with Andy Murray in his first grand slam semi-final, locals have flocked to the Cilic home to offer congratulations.

“We are mostly happy that Marin is injury free and he is healthy,” Mrs Cilic told The Age last night. “We had been planning a big party but my mum is quite ill so that has overshadowed everything a bit.

“We were celebrating after the quarter-final, but not as much as usual because of mum's illness. But there will be time. We like to celebrate the best when we are all together and when Marin and his older brother Vinko, who is on tour with him, are here as well.”

The family, which has reportedly been climbing up Medjugorje's Apparition Hill to pray to Mary for Cilic's success to continue, will at least get some shut-eye before the semi-final.

The match will be shown mid-morning European time, unlike Cilic’s previous rounds at the Open, which kept the family awake around the clock.

Cilic had an early start in tennis. Local coaches in Ljubuski, near Medjugorje, told Zdenko Cilic that “the kid has something”. Cilic senior immediately built a tennis court in his backyard.

Now ranked 14th in the world, Cilic left his home town for Croatia’s capital Zagreb aged 14 to develop his game.

He travels with brother Vinko, and during the Australian Open, a family friend has joined the team, too, making Marin home-cooked meals in Melbourne.

And relatives from Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide are also there at Melbourne Park to support him from the stands.

So what does Mrs Cilic think of her son’s current obstacle, the Andy he is yet to beat? “If he's well rested, I think he’ll have a strong win against Murray,” she said.

sourced and adapted from: theage.com.au

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Medjugorje tennis star moves up in Aussie Open

Medjugorje tennis player Marin Cilic has reached the semi-final round of the men’s singles in the Australian Open Tennis Championship. He beat Andy Roddick to qualify. Known as “Mrjna” to his family and friends, Cilic is ranked number 14 in the world and will now face Britain’s Andy Murray who qualified for the semi-final stage after beating Rafel Nadal.

Monday, January 25, 2010

January message of Our Lady given to Marija



Dear children! May this time be a time of personal prayer for you, so that the seed of faith may grow in your hearts; and may it grow into a joyful witness to others. I am with you and I desire to inspire you all: grow and rejoice in the Lord who has created you. Thank you for having responded to my call. January 25, 2010

There are those who have received the seed in rich soil: they hear the word and accept it and yield a harvest, thirty and sixty and a hundredfold. Mark 4 : 20

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Dinamo players prepare with pilgrimage...

Players of Dinamo Zagreb, the top club in the Croatian Football League, are preparing for the resumption of their season after the winter break with a pilgimage to Medjugorje, combined with training facilities in the village. Here we see the players praying on Apparition Hill. Afterwards they went to Confession and attended Mass celebrated by Fr Karlo Lovrić. Later the team exchanged gifts and presents with some of the other Franciscans in the parish. Dinamo currently holds first place in the national league after 17 games.

Fifth bishop for Bosnia & Herzegovina

Msgr Petar Rajic today became the fifth bishop of the Catholic Church in Bosnia Herzegovina when he was ordained as an Archbishop by the Vatican Secertary of State, cardinal Bertone in the Mary the Mother of the Church cathedral, Mostar. The other bishops are Sarajevo Archbishop cardinal Vinko Puljic, his auxillary bishop Pero Sudar, Banja Luka bishop Franjo Komarica and Mostar-duvanjskog bishop Ratko Peric.

The new Archbishop is recently appointed by Pope Benedict XVI to serve as Apostolic Nuncio to Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar, and as Apostolic Delegate to the Arabian Peninsula.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Spotlight on Cardinal provides ‘report’ to Rome...

Medjugorje ‘Commission’ revealed...

As part of an exclusive interview published today by the Austrian Catholic news agency, kath.net, the Archbishop of Vienna, cardinal Schönborn, has spoken again about Medjugorje and made mention of a commission set up by the Holy Father.


When asked if he had spoken about his pilgrimage to Medjugorje during his recent private meeting with Pope Benedict XVI, the cardinal said it is not customary to report on this form of audience but he could say that because of the public spotlight on his pilgrimage, Medjugorje has been a topic in Rome and his impressions have been reported.

Cardinal Schönborn added that he is very confident the commission appointed by the Holy Father to examine the events at Medjugorje will work very well and responsibly, and that the outcome will certainly be good. He also said he is confident that great prudence and sensitivity is being applied to a phenomenon that has attracted 30 million pilgrims and produced very good fruit, but also some unanswered questions.

Cardinal Schönborn celebrates his 65th birthday on Sunday.

More Medjugorje comment from a Cardinal

The Italian television morning programme Mattino Cinque recently turned its attention to Medjugorje and interviewed two cardinals, Archbishop Christoph Schönborn and Msgr Ersilio Tonini.

Most of what cardinal Schönborn spoke about with programme presenter Federica Panicucci has been widely published, but here are some very revealing responses made by cardinal Tonini:

“The position of the church in regards to Medjugorje has always been carefully observed. In this matter, I can tell you of how one day I visited Pope John Paul II. Two bishops were there talking to him, and the conversation casually fell on Medjugorje. One bishop was enthusiastic about it, while the other was rather doubtful. The pope cut it short by stating: ‘God's grace is free to move how, when, and where it wants.’ This greatly impressed me, since I understood very well that the Pope rejoiced in knowing that the Virgin Mary still has the courage to appear in front of human creatures, to remind them that while time goes by, eternity comes, and it is in eternity that God’s plans are. By carrying the thought of eternity in our lives, we are then able to feel that we are God’s children. These are indeed the big promises which the Lord Jesus came to bring us: to let us know that God awaits us, that we are his children, that he is preparing to pour all his love upon us.

“I repeat that such meeting – given that I saw the Pope so interested on the subject of Medjugorje – greatly impacted on me, and I told myself that perhaps the Lord’s grace wants to make itself felt even more and that the pope, in that instance, felt directly, personally called to this cause. This truly impressed me.”

The cardinal then added: “The Catholic Church does not deem to own the apparitions. Our Lady is free to appear whenever she wants. The Catholic Church is very glad that God manifests himself through miracles and through Our Lady’s apparitions. The Church is obviously jealous and doesn’t want any follies to be introduced, it doesn’t want that there may be creatures who own the apparitions and make Our Lady say what they want her to say. This is an extremely delicate subject. The Church has recognised Our Lady’s right to speak; and naturally, since these are enormous treasures, the Church is jealous that some ‘inventory’ fables, prodigies or miracles may be introduced. This is why I am happy that the Archbishop of Vienna, whom I know very well, is present (appearing on Mattino Cinque); his word is a word of warranty.”

Cardinal Ersilio Tonini made a pilgrimage to Medjugorje in 2009. Afterwards he testified: “I think Medjugorje is a blessed place and a grace of God; who goes to Medjugorje returns transformed, changed, he reflects himself in that source of grace that is Christ. Christ is at the same time the tap and the source. If in Medjugorje, as it is obvious by now, many conversions happen, it surely means that there is the hand of God. I believe that we should look at Medjugorje with serenity and trust, appreciating all the good and holy things that happen in that place,”

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Medjugorje on fire...

“I’m saying distinctly there are fruits there – good fruits – or you could also say there can be no smoke without a fire and in Medjugorje there obviously is a fire.”
Christoph cardinal Schönborn OP

Jesus said to his disciples: “I have come to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were blazing already!”
Luke 12 : 49

Medjugorje welcomes top soccer team

Top Croatian soccer club Dinamo Zagreb is in Medjugorje preparing to resume its season after the winter break. The team is staying close to St James church at the hotel Villa Regina.

Dinamo is the most successful club in Croatian soccer history and has support throughout the world. It holds top place in the Croatian National League table after 17 games.

My heart carefully follows your progress...

In the Gospel readings so far this week we have been introduced to “people-watchers” – in particular, the type of watcher who seeks to find fault and accuse.

On Monday (Mark 2 : 18-22) some people observe that the disciples of Jesus are not fasting and question this with Jesus. On Tuesday (Mark 2 : 23-28) the Pharisees watch the disciples of Jesus and accuse them of doing something that is forbidden. Today (Mark 3 : 1-6) Jesus is watched closely by those hoping for something to use against him.

Our Lady is also a people-watcher, but in a different way. She watches over all her children – not to seek fault or accuse – but with motherly love. She says: I am with you and unceasingly keep watch over every heart which is given to me… Little children, I will watch your daily conversion with love… My heart carefully follows your progress.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Bishop of Mostar seeks closure on debate...

A spokesman for the Diocese of Mostar has today told the German Catholic press agency KNA that it considers the matter regarding Cardinal Schönborn’s pilgrimage to Medjugorje and the discussion relating to his visit, now closed.

Cardinal Schönborn wrote to bishop Ratko Peric and part of his hand-written letter was published on the Mostar Diocese website (without permission of the cardinal). It stated: “I regret if you have the impression that my pilgrimage to Medjugorje did a disservice to peace. Rest assured that this was not my intention.”

The Mostar spokesperson has now admitted that the letter was not intended for full publication as it contains confidential information, and that his bishop now considers the matter closed.

In a few days from now the Mostar Diocese will be hosting two more cardinals – the Vatican Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone and Vinko Puljic, Archbishop of Sarajevo. Cardinal Bertone, is due in Mostar on Saturday to ordain Msgr Petar Rajic as a Titular Archbishop to serve as a papal nuncio. Cardinal Puljic is co-consecrator with bishop Peric.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Cardinal’s TV response to bishop’s criticism

In a recent interview with the Austrian TV station ORF2, cardinal Shönborn spoke about Medjugorje and the reaction to his visit by Msgr Ratko Peric, the Ordinary of the Mostar Diocese.

“The Church is entitled to the last judgment but one thing is for sure: People are experiencing there the help, closeness, and protection of the Mother of God in a special way. And certainly they would not make pilgrimages there for 28 years if there wasn’t anything there. This doesn’t already mean that I am anticipating the decision of the Church but I’m saying distinctly there are fruits there – good fruits – or you could also say there can be no smoke without a fire and in Medjugorje there obviously is a fire.”

Regarding the public criticism by bishop Ratko Peric:

“Of course we can be of different opinion regarding things that have not been ultimately decided yet, and I respect him (the bishop) as a fellow brother. I am united with him in prayer and I also believe that we can both confidently await the decision of the Church and can entrust ourselves to this decision with confidence, without polemics.”

Regarding the bishop’s criticism that the cardinal had not announced himself:

“Of course I could have tried to pay him a visit in Mostar. It is not absolutely necessary and before me there have been many bishops in Medjugorje. We know that he has a somewhat different opinion here. I want to avoid polemics. For me it is not about being proved correct against him, but I certainly have not violated the right that is also the right of a bishop and cardinal.”

• The programme Orientierung in which cardinal Schönborn gave his interview was transmitted on ORF2, Sunday, January 10, 2010.

Mirjana to meet with Our Lady in Naples...

Next month, the visionary Mirjana is due to attend a Marian Prayer Vigil in Naples, Italy, on a day she normally receives a visitation from Our Lady, February 2.

Austrian Church official rejects rumour against Cardinal Schönborn

The Catholic news service, Kath.net, reports that a senior Austrian church official has quashed the rumour put out by an Italian website linking Cardinal Schönborn’s meeting with the Holy Father last Friday morning to a faxed letter he later sent on the same day to the bishop of Mostar, Ratko Peric, that referred to his recent visit to Medjugorje.

The Church spokesperson rejected the rumour as baseless and also pointed out that the Mostar bishop did not consult with the cardinal before publishing [part of] his fax on the Mostar Diocese official website.

The Kath.net report also states that the cardinal’s meeting with the Holy Father had been fixed for some time and that only two people were at the meeting, the cardinal and the Pope. No one else was present.

It adds that the Pope has not responded positively or negatively to Medjugorje but has no problem with cardinals and bishops visiting there – and in fact met today with the new Belgian Archbishop of Mechlen-Brussels, André-Mutien Léonard, who has visited Medjugorje several times and is known for his strong support of new spiritual communities and movements within the Church such as the Community of the Beatitudes.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Cardinal Schönborn has met with Holy Father

Just two weeks after returning from his visit to Medjugorje, the Archbishop of Vienna, Cardinal Schönborn, was granted a private audience with Pope Benedict XVI in Rome last Friday (January 15).

We can only wonder if the cardinal witnessed to the Holy Father all that he had seen and heard at Medjugorje.

When interviewed recently by the German newspaper Die Tagespost the cardinal was asked if he would report his impressions of Medjugorje to the Holy See. He stated that he went on pilgrimage for personal reasons but does not conceal his attitude to Medjugorje from his brothers, which has deepened since his visit. He confirmed that he has spoken with many bishops and will continue to do so and that this was part of the Church view and judgment.

Archbishop ordination set for Mostar

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Vatican Secretary of State, will visit Mostar next weekend to ordain Msgr Petar Rajic (pictured) as an Archbishop. Msgr Rajic was recently appointed by Pope Benedict XVI to serve as Apostolic Nuncio to Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar, and as Apostolic Delegate to the Arabian Peninsula.

Cardinal Vinko Puljic and bishop Ratko Perić will act as co-consecrators at the ordination on January 23.

The Archbishop-elect was born in Toronto, Canada in 1959 and ordained a priest in 1987 by bishop Pavao Žanić. His parents are originally from Doljai, the parish of Dracevo, in the diocese of Trebinje-Mrkan.


Msgr Rajic will be given the Titular Episcopal See of Sarsenterum (Croatia)

Friday, January 15, 2010

Bishop’s ‘outstanding experience’ in Medjugorje

Bishop Seamus Hegarty of the Derry diocese in Ireland is one of many prelates who have made a private pilgrimage to Medjugorje. He travelled there in July 1987 (when he was bishop of Raphoe) and afterwards gave this testimony.

I had heard so much about the Medjugorje phenomenon and, as things turned out, managed to go there myself for five days in July 1987. I went, of course, as a private pilgrim, a private person.

I couldn’t help being enormously impressed by everyone, both local parishioners and those who visit Medjugorje from all over Europe and overseas. I also got a very clear impression that here in Medjugorje you are dealing with a centre of prayer, of penance, and of reconciliation.

“By their fruits you shall know them.” Here the fruits are so manifest, so clear and impressive, both in Medjugorje itself and among those who return home after a pilgrimage, that they simply cannot be ignored.

Among many people from my own diocese that had been to Medjugorje I noticed the ongoing, positive results in relation both to their personal and family life. Thus I felt simply obliged to go to the place and find out myself the source, the explanation, of this experience, this tremendous manifestation of faith, this high and exemplary Christian way of life.

I have read the messages the Mother of God is said to be giving to the visionaries. And what I have seen and heard tells me that there is a strong accord, a parallel, between these messages and what the gospels say about the teaching of Christ. The emphasis is very strongly on prayer, fasting, reconciliation and peace – themes that occur over and over again in Scripture. One thing is clear about the Medjugorje messages: they contain nothing that contradicts the Church’s official teaching, which is based on Scripture as on a foundation. Here the emphasis is on prayer and how to pray – that is, with more giving of ourselves and intensity, and new methods of prayer; prayer not only in words but also as something lived.

But what is likewise emphasised in the messages is fasting. It has a long Church tradition behind it. Of recent years, however, it has fallen into disuse on a wide scale. Now it has been revived as a challenge that young people, in particular, face up to in a dramatic way.

We recognise that in Medjugorje we are dealing with a genuine call to peace, and that peace is a divine gift for which we all must pray. On the basis of what I myself observed in Medjugorje, and which everyone that has been there likewise observes, I believe that we are going to experience a radiation of this atmosphere of peace which has it origin, its centre, in Medjugorje, thereupon extending itself over the entire world.

Many prayer groups have been formed as a direct result of a pilgrimage to Medjugorje, an outcome of the religious experience people gain there and which they thereupon keep up and apply to their own life circumstances among their families and communities. Beyond doubt, the Medjugorje phenomenon has had a particular success in everything to do with fostering prayer. Not only do people more than is normal in parishes, but the quality of their prayer is particularly impressive.

The rosary, as we would expect, is one of the most important forms of prayer practised by Medjugorje groups. What has strongly impressed me is that in its recitation the biblical dimension of the mysteries is brought out so prominently.

As regards the Church – the official Church – it cannot afford to ignore this development. Bishops and priests must encourage these prayer groups and, in my opinion, must also be present at them to give leadership and due advice and spiritual orientation. It must also be said that the laity who, with good intentions and devotion, come together to pray deserve every help and direction they can get from the clergy. While, it is true, the presence of a priest is not absolutely necessary at prayer meetings, it is nonetheless most desirable in order that exaggerations and unrealistic or mistaken ideas and expectations may be avoided.

It would be a great pity if Medjugorje’s central message (prayer, fasting, reconciliation and peace) became obscured in any way or if excessive emphasis came to be placed on signs and wonders. Accordingly, the presence at these prayer meetings of the Official Church in the person of the priest is very much to be desired.

My most outstanding experience in Medjugorje was the hearing of Confessions. One day I spent three hours doing so. And I am sure that during those three hours I heard more Confessions of the kind that are basic and come from the depth of the heart than during all the 21 years of my priesthood. I could not help but be moved by the workings of grace – the clear workings of grace; also, by the clear acceptance of the call to penance and reconciliation which expressed themselves so unmistakably in the quality of the Confessions I heard. So this experience will ever remain my most impressive and abiding Medjugorje memory.

Martin Pero Boras has died

Martin Pero Boras, known to Medjugorje pilgrims as leader of the International Choir and Orchestra for the Medjugorje Youth Festival, died on Wednesday in Mostar Hospital. He was only 55 and was married with four children. His funeral was held today.

Born in Ljubuski, Martin was Music Professor to many generations of Franciscans in the seminary and novice at Humac. He also taught music in many schools and worked with Franciscan Youth groups (FRAMA) throughout Herzegovina, as well as in Medjugorje. May he rest in peace.

Thank you for the joy you brought to my heart at Mladifest 09

MARY’S MEALS HAITI QUAKE APPEAL

The long-suffering people of Haiti now face a new tragedy and they are going to need our help to recover from it. A large earthquake has struck the capital Port Au Prince and surrounding area. It has caused widespread damage and loss of life. The shanty town slum, Cite Soleil, is one of the worst affected places.

Haiti is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere and the majority of the people live in terrible poverty. Mary’s Meals has been working in Haiti since 2006 and we provide meals for over 12,000 children in schools in Cite Soleil, Gonaives and Hinche.

We have just heard that our friends and partners in Cite Soleil are safe and we are now busy working out how best we can start helping. Our priority will be to re-establish school feeding as soon as we can. We also want to respond to the many other needs caused by this emergency.

We need your help to do this.

MARYSMEALS .ORG
MARYSMEALSUSA.ORG

Not seers’ duty to convince says cardinal

“It is not the seers’ duty to convince; it is their duty to communicate. Regardless of the future final judgment on these phenomena, one thing is evident: the messages are simply evangelical, they have common sense: prayer, peace, reconciliation with God and amongst us, and we always, always have to remember that there is no greater miracle than Eucharist itself; the coming of Jesus amongst us, in the poorest village, in the most beautiful cathedral, in St Peter's Basilica in Rome...”
Christoph cardinal Schönborn.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

TOMORROW...
a bishop’s witness to his ‘outstanding experience’ at Medjugorje.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Medjugorje a blessed place says Cardinal

Cardinal Ersilio Tonini made a pilgrimage to Medjugorje in 2009. Afterwards he testified: “I think Medjugorje is a blessed place and a grace of God; who goes to Medjugorje returns transformed, changed, he reflects himself in that source of grace that is Christ. Christ is at the same time the tap and the source. If in Medjugorje, as it is obvious by now, many conversions happen, it surely means that there is the hand of God. I believe that we should look at Medjugorje with serenity and trust, appreciating all the good and holy things that happen in that place,”

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Monday, January 11, 2010

Mother Church

As Christians, thanks to the gift of the Holy Spirit received in baptism, we have the gift and task of living as sons of God, and brothers and sisters, to be like ‘leaven’ in a new humanity, united and rich in peace and hope. We are helped in this by the consciousness of having, besides a Father in heaven, a mother too, the Church, of whom the Virgin Mary is the perennial model. Pope Bendict XVI, January 10, 2009

Friday, January 08, 2010

“I want to return to Medjugorje,” says Cardinal

In an interview given to kath.net Cardinal Schönborn, the Archbishop of Vienna, has made more comment about his time spent in Medjugorje recently .

He said that it was rather unusual for a Cardinal to visit Medjugorje as a pilgrim but has since heard that several other cardinals and bishops had been there in a very private way.

He added that Medjugorje is now one of the greatest pilgrimage sites in the world to travel to.

The cardinal also confirmed that Medjugorje had played an important part for many young priests on their personal path to the priesthood.

He referred to the annual Youth Festival at Medjugorje and said that, other than Taize, there is no other place that gathers so many young people and that this reflects the global importance of the phenomenon.

Cardinal Schönborn revealed that he had listened to Confessions for two and a half hours in Medjugorje, and that some of the penitents had not received the Sacrament for 20 or 30 years.

“How does this tree bear such fruit?” the cardinal asked.

He went on to speak about the phenomena of apparitions around the world and said that apparitions have their own language, that they provide simple uncomplicated messages which can get to the heart of the Christian message. He said that in Medjugorje the messages have a distinguishing feature with Our Lady’s call to peace and revealing herself as the Queen of Peace.

The cardinal confirmed again that the official position of the Church is as the Zadar declaration of 1991 made by the Yugoslav bishops’ conference. He said that this declaration has been confirmed at least twice and an ideal guideline to keep to.

On the question of the Church providing a definitive ruling when the phenomena are completed the cardinal said that there are many Marian apparition sites where an ecclesiastical verdict is not pronounced but still pilgrimages take place. He also stressed that ‘official’ pilgrimages to Medjugorje (pilgrimages organised by a diocese) cannot take place but support will be given to the spiritual needs of pilgrims who go there.

The cardinal also pointed out the deep level of prayer witnessed at Medjugorje and that the pilgrims show an incredible desire to return. He said that he could only explain that the closeness of Our Lady is good for the people and he also definitely wants to return to Medjugorje.

When asked if Medjugorje was a place of grace the cardinal said that to doubt that grace flows from Medjugorje it is necessary to close our eyes and the evidence was very obvious that graces spring from Medjugorje.

As to the messages and locutions cardinal Schönborn said that when Rome investigated the claims of Sr Faustina, who received daily messages from Jesus, it was very critical but the phenomena stood the test of time. He emphasised that the Church is always very cautious in this respect and it is a good thing.

He then added it was also very important that the fruits are not hampered and he was particularly impressed by the amount of good works resulting from the Medjugorje. He specifically mentioned the Cenacolo Community and Mother Village founded by the late Fr Slavko Barbaric.

He spoke about Medjugorje in the light of the Second vatican Council and the “sensus fidelium”, the faith of the people. He said that the messages play an important role for pilgrims to stay “connected“ to Medjugorje and that without the initial momentum there would be no Medjugorje today, but he did not want to speculate “recognition” and that for him as a bishop it is important that nothing in the messages is contrary to faith. He added that in this time Our Lady manifests herself as Queen of Peace and that is the theme of the messages from Medjugorje, peace with the emphasis on conversion, because when we are peace with each other we are peace with God.

The cardinal was asked that in the light of people’s lives changing at Medjugorje is there anything he does differently since his vist. The cardinal responded by saying that if there was, he would not say, but he knows through a long association with Lourdes that a close union with the Mother can lead to God. He stressed the pastoral care of Our Lady in bringing people to her Son and how her words can touch hearts and get people to say “Yes”.

When asked if he would report his impressions to the Holy See, the cardinal stated he went on pilgrimage for personal reasons but he does not conceal his attitude to Medjugorje from his brothers, which has deepened since his visit. He confirmed that he has spoken with many bishops and will continue to do so and that this was part of the Church view and judgment. He added that as a visiting Cardinal to Medjugorje it brought consolation to the people who were there on New Year’s Eve.

Cardinal Schönborn in Medjugorje – new videos



And so many priests!



...Cardinal Schönborn joins Sr Elvira for the Cenacolo Community presentation of the Christmas Nativity in front of St James’ Church at Medjugorje. The Cenacolo Community recently received Pontifical Recognition by the Church. Sr Elvira is the founder of the Community which now has some 50 houses around the world, including one in the U.K. at Kendall



Cardinal Schönborn meets with priests and Italian TV celebrity Paolo Brosio, who informs the cardinal of his conversion at Medjugorje and presents him with a book that records the account of his experience.

Investigate all and hold on to what is good.

The Events in Medjugorje
by Dr. Tomislav Pervan, OFM


For the past twenty-five years, Medjugorje has been an actuality on the world scene. Today, it has its zealous advocates; however, it also has its fierce opponents. Opposing front lines in the battle are not likely to sue for peace any time soon. Advocates are tireless in their visits to Medjugorje all the while believing the authentic voice of Heaven is the starting point, namely, the appearance of the Gospa—Our Lady. Meanwhile, the opponents are fierce in their opposition and seek out elements of contention surrounding the entire set of events.

In the meantime, the ever-increasing daily flow of pilgrims to this place does not allow us to be indifferent. Facts and numbers speak for themselves. The number of pilgrims is ever increasing. They come from all corners of the earth, are of all colours of skin, and from all nations and nationalities. While other places of pilgrimage mark a decrease in pilgrims and pilgrimages despite being advertised widely, the number of pilgrims and faithful of all languages and locales constantly increases. As a phenomenon, Medjugorje does not have an active propaganda machine: individuals spread its fame by word-of-mouth, witness, and personal experience.

On the one hand, the priests who work in Medjugorje feel they are over-burdened in their daily work and that they are stretched to their physical limits. They are faced with innumerable calls for personal counseling, endless confessions, and constant evangelization. On the other hand, they are also faced with the suspicion that they are teetering at the edge of heterodoxy. The constant criticism is hurled at them that they are fostering something that is contrary to the Church, namely, the non-existent apparitions and the like. We, on the other hand, cannot fail to speak, fail to give witness about that which we have heard or seen, or that which we experience daily by way of our senses. (Cf. Acts 4:20) Hence, we invite all to come and see. So many bishops and priests had their doubts; however, after many hours of hearing confessions, they changed their minds and the doubts vanished.

The voice of conscience forces upon us the obligation to be of assistance to those who are in misery and who come here. We wish to be in harmony with the Church to the very end, and not to sin against the Church's teachings or practice. Meanwhile, the accusations and reproaches hurt. Quite frequently, questions are raised that ask: What need did we have of all of this? Were we not able to be as every other parish, that is, carry out the well-entrenched pastoral patterns within the usual norms of the Church and Gospels? Who was it that cooked this stew, such that, to this very day, the river of pilgrims has not dried up, but, to the contrary, continues to grow greater and more dynamic?

For this reason, and as a friend and participant of these events from their beginnings in 1981, I give consideration to what must be done to change the present situations to escape the entrenched position of persistent denial, constant disputation, or, in fact, indifference and silence on the part of the Church's media all of this while the flow of thousands of pilgrims to this place continues. It is obvious that all the denials, disputations, and silence find no acceptance on the part of the faithful. Meanwhile, Church circles continue to be deaf, and the prohibition against this activity on the part the faithful persists on the part of the media.

It is the inner voice of conscience and the experience of faith that motivate the faithful. I am convinced that the Holy Spirit Himself is the initiator of all these events. I am further convinced that, after twenty-five years have passed, the principle of the locus theologicus (the theological position), according to the notion of the sensus fidelium (understanding on the part of the faithful) and the consensus fidelium (unanimity of the faithful), applies as offered for acceptance by the documents of Vatican II and post-Vatican II, and by statements of Popes following the Council. Things we read about in the Acts of the Apostles are happening here. I am convinced that the Church is being gathered in this place from the four winds and every corner of the earth into the one Kingdom as what took place in Jerusalem at Pentecost. In this place, we find mirrored the universal—“Catholic” Church in miniature.

It is in this sense that I believe the instruction of the Congregation for the Faith entitled, The Criteria for Judging and Differentiating Revelations and Apparitions, dated the 27th of February, 1978, and signed by the then Prefect, Cardinal Franjo Seper, should serve as the vade mecum (that is, the constant companion, the manual) when considering, passing judgment upon, and making decisions about Medjugorje and the Medjugorje phenomenon. The text has lost nothing of its immediacy and value to this very day. It can be fully applied to the events of Medjugorje with all its implications. It can examine the events of Medjugorje from the positive or negative side with all the arguments presented pro and con.

The Congregation for the Faith in its instructions reduces to three levels, or degrees, the norms that relate to reactions to alleged apparitions.

The seers must be examined to determine if, perhaps, it is a question of self-styled visions. Then, all the messages must be gathered and examined and viewed from the point of view of the degree of education of the seers. The mental and physical state of the seers must be examined thoroughly, as well as their moral integrity. All that is explainable from the purely human point of view must be taken into consideration; however, by the same token, all that cannot be explained in purely human terms and with the aid of the most contemporary psychological or physical sciences, and which, in the end, has no cause within human power, must also be taken into consideration.

Following the first phase, if the matter has not died on its own, has not come to a halt or fallen into oblivion, the principle ad experimentum (for the purpose of experiment) comes into play. At the same time, of course, it must be emphasized that the employment of this principle in no way suggests or recognizes the authenticity of the alleged apparitions. It simply channels events to proper and healthy Church routine: practices regarding prayer, devotions, the sacraments, constant spiritual growth and holiness.

When an appropriate period of the ad experimentum phase has elapsed, and in the light of experiences, especially after a close examination of the spiritual fruits occasioned by the alleged apparitions, and of the devotional practices surrounding them, a competent judgment of the events must be given if circumstances demand it.

As regards the first point, everything can be reduced to a simple conclusion: To the present day, in the entire history of the Church, no Marian apparitions were so intensively and extensively investigated (from 1984-2005) on the part of numerous and independent qualified, international experts in the fields of medicine and psychology, or whose investigations and their results were found to correspond to and compliment each other. All of the experts concluded that the subjects investigated were found to be spiritually, psychologically, and physically healthy individuals. They were found not to be hallucinating, subject to confabulation, (auto) suggestion, hysteria, hypnotic or other loss of consciousness, deceit, suggestion or exterior inducement of any sort. Hence, it is irresponsible to publicly proclaim them to be liars or inventors of false visions and messages.

Many experts from the fields of medicine, psychology, and parapsychology have occupied themselves with the Medjugorje seers. They failed to uncover any sort of pathological deviation from the norm in their lives. The scientific experts are capable of reaching the full limit of their tests. However, once they have arrived at that limit, their ability to explain ceases. They are able to discern what does or does not pertain to medicine and pathology and what must be excluded from a medico-psychological perspective. The experts have done so and have left behind a record of their findings. Because of that, and because of intellectual honesty, we, who have regard for the truth, must take their investigations and judgments as to the phenomena of Medjugorje into serious account.

The convergent proofs in favour of the authenticity of the Medjugorje phenomenon are perceptible when one takes into consideration the theological, sociological and scientific experiments carried out upon the seers by French, Italian, and Austrian teams of experts from 1984 through 2005. According to the theologian and Mariologist, R. Laurentin, who has published works of capital value (17 books) on Lourdes, and has thoroughly investigated the apparitions in Medjugorje, the latter give evidence of being more powerful as regards the proof of their authenticity than those in Lourdes, to which the Church gave its formal approval.

According to the teaching of St. Ignatius on discernment of spirits, the causes of those or similar manifestations can be determined to be purely human, divine, or demonic. Effects must always be judged by their cause. In all that took place in Medjugorje, one must ask what the cause was, or where the causal beginnings had their roots. If we take into consideration the first days of the events that took place in Bijakovici in June and July of 1981, the experts who thoroughly examined the seers concluded that the seers had some sort of fundamental and key experience, some initial encounter that put them into the center of something that they could not begin to imagine or foresee, something against their will or inclinations, something they were scarcely able to predict.

Science as such can neither confirm nor deny whether the Gospa is, or is not, appearing, (just as it would not have been able to utilize scientific instruments to register the resurrection of Christ were they to have been present alongside the Roman guards at the tomb of Jesus). All that science can say after twenty-five years is that the seers are physically and psychologically healthy, and that the seers had a deep-seated and far-reaching experience which continues to affect them to this very day, one that it is impossible to deduce from their biographies. All of that is, for the visionaries, a holy treasure. For that reason one must exclude a purely human cause, and, by the same token, one that is demonic, inasmuch as the Devil is unable to yield good fruit that is constant and so long lasting.

Since twenty-five years have elapsed, a review sine ira et studio (without rancor and [with] diligent attention) would be expedient, both in the local Church and the Church at large, as to the fruits which have been given and continue to be given through Mary's apparitions beyond all ideological suppositions and prejudices. When observed from the purely statistical point of view as a whole, close to some fifty thousand priest have passed through Medjugorje, hundreds of bishops, cardinals, and millions upon millions of the faithful. The Una Sancta et Catholica (the One Holy and Catholic [Church]) in miniature comes to pass here every day. Were there something to be found heretical, schismatic, or contrary to Church teaching, the Church would be obliged to undertake measures against such abuse. That has not resulted up to the present. Therefore, a fifteen-year ad experimentum period since the Zadar Pronouncement in 1991 is a sufficient amount of time so as to allow to conclude that no straying from official Church teaching and practice is taking place in Medjugorje. The Liturgy and devotions celebrated there are fully Christological, Marian, Eucharistic, sacramental, and in full harmony with Church regulations.

It cannot be asserted that the particular fruits of Medjugorje are those of intensive prayer and administration of the sacraments. To do so would be to create a circulus vitiosus (vicious circle): there are other places in the world where prayer and the sacraments are a fixed practice; however, what is lacking there are the efficacious effects that we note as attributable to Medjugorje. It is clear that prayer and the sacraments bear copious fruits for the entire Church throughout the world; however, from where and why do so many people come precisely to Medjugorje? Why do they come to this remote place where they have a concrete experience of God and grace, are converted, learn to pray, and subsequently carry the fruits of Medjugorje to their homes, give witness to what they have experienced, and become missionaries? It simply is not possible to separate the assertions of the seers regarding the apparitions from the fruits of the apparitions which we see in the Church.

The consensus fidei et fidelium can be seen by the fact that all levels of God's people, all classes in society and the Church, all peoples, and all races are represented in Medjugorje, and by the fact that Church life is sustained by all of this in the form of witness, divine worship, sincere service, charity, (martyria, liturgia, et diakonia), and, by the fact that all grow in holiness. Medjugorje is a world-wide phenomenon. Its fruits can be seen in all parts of the world. In essence, Medjugorje is a laymen’s movement, a movement of faithful laymen, laden with spirituality, devotion, and sincerity toward the Lord and our Lady. The seers themselves are ordinary lay people and, as such, are able more readily to touch the hearts of plain folks who easily identify with them.

Medjugorje is a peace and pilgrimage movement inasmuch as people come here for the sake of inner peace. It is also a renewal movement within the Church—Ecclesia semper reformanda (the Church ever to be renewed), as well as a humanitarian movement, inasmuch as it has accomplished tremendous charitable and Samaritan works throughout the world (a point made by the present Pope in his encyclical on the God of Love). Lumen Gentium (The Vatican II Document: Light of the Nations) clearly states: "Be they most illustrious, be they simple and more widespread, Charisms are useful and are especially suited to the needs of the Church and must be received with gratitude and consolidation." (LG 12:2) Meanwhile, Apostolicam Actuositatem (Apostolic Activity) states even more explicitly: "The receipt of Charisms, even those that are humble, give rise to the right and duty for each of the faithful to make use of them in the Church and in the world and for the good of mankind and the growth of the Church in the freedom of the Holy Ghost." (AA 3:3).

After the past quarter of a century, it can be asserted that Medjugorje is about a prophetic Charism—a prophetic revelation that calls for repentance. These Charisms are able to be found in all similar phenomena within the Church. Prophetic revelations and apparitions are about an imperative under the impetus of the Holy Spirit as to how one is to behave here and now, and what it is that the People of God must do in a specific situation. Accordingly, the Church must not relate to such phenomena indifferently. She is duty-bound to investigate such an imperative with openness and, congruently, to act if she recognizes the Will of God in the said phenomenon. It is obvious that the Ecclesia orans (the praying Church) has recognized God’s Will and Mary’s presence in this instance, of which our dearly departed Pope spoke in his homily in Zadar (!) three years prior, on the feast of Mary, the Mother of the Church (Pentecost Monday, 2003). On that occasion, the Pope specifically mentioned the above cited sensus fidei fidelium (the understanding of faith of the faithful).

If, as is the case with ordinary beatifications and canonizations, the process begins with the local Church, and, after an appropriate interval of time, investigation, and conclusions based on the materials offered in favor of beatification or canonization, the matter is transferred to Rome, I think that would be appropriate in this case. After all has been investigated at the local level, the entire case of the Medjugorje phenomenon should be transferred to the appropriate Roman dicastery, especially in light of the fact that it has outgrown the local Church's boundaries and has become widespread so as to encompass the entire Church. The countless prayer groups throughout the entire world have come into existence because of the events in Medjugorje. They carry the mark of authenticity and veracity. The entire phenomenon is caught-up in the very being of the Church and, as such, carries more weight than does a beatification of one of God's chosen ones. If, as is the case for beatification, the People of God are asked their approval, why shouldn't we do so in this case as well, especially in light of Mary’s efficacious presence in specific places (John Paul II, in Zadar!), and in light of the personal experiences and miracles that individuals experienced precisely here in Medjugorje?

Throughout the entire history of Salvation, God has established communication with his creatures through apparitions. This form of communication is especially suitable for man’s physico-spiritual structure: it immerses man’s senses, especially his sight and hearing. The Medjugorje phenomenon can be explained in this manner or that manner; however, intellectual honesty demands that the entire affair engage us in light of revelation, mysticism, supernatural experiences and so many other similar experiences in other cases, and, for that matter, in other faiths.

If God has truly spoken throughout history, why should we be exempted from such a manner of communication wherein the Holy Ghost makes use of apparitions for the sake of the many needs of the contemporary world? The greater the misery in the world, so much the greater is the need for God's voice and communication. Hence, we might well conclude as did Paul: Do not extinguish the spirit. Do not disdain prophetic communications. Investigate all and hold on to what is good! (1 Thess. 5:19-21).

Medjugorje, July 13, 2006
Fr Tomislav Pervan OFM

Former Pastor of Medjugorje (1982-1988)
Former Provincial of the Franciscans (OFM) in Hercegovina (1994-2001)

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Mirajana January apparition video

When Mary speaks...

In today’s Gospel (Luke 2 : 1-11) we hear Mary say to her Son Jesus: They have no wine. Then she speaks to the servants and says, Do whatever he tells you.

Both Jesus and the servants respond to the voice of Mary. And so a miracle happens.

It is like this at Medjugorje. When Mary speaks to her children, who serve Jesus, she says: Thank you for responding to my call.
She is thanking us for the miracles of life.

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Supreme authority with Holy See says Cardinal

“Supreme authority in the Church is the Holy See, the Holy Father and his Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and that is the highest authority in all of the issues of faith and morality. Supreme authority of the Church gave us clear guidelines, not directly from Holy Father himself, but from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that had clearly confirmed what the bishops from Yugoslavia once said, and that undoubtedly is applicable in Medjugorje.”
Cardinal Schonborn, January 2010.

The Position of the Church and Medjugorje: FULL TEXT

Remember...

Do not be afraid, my children,
I am here with you,
I am next to you.

part Medjugorje message, January 2, 2010

The fruits and signs remain...



A voice cries in the wilderness;
prepare a way for the Lord,
make his paths straight.


Every time I pray for you all, I pray with joy, remembering how you helped to spread the Good News from the day you first heard it right up to the present. I am quite certain that the One who began this good work in you will see that it is finished when the Day of Christ Jesus comes. God knows how much I miss you all, loving you as Christ Jesus loves you. My prayer is that your love for each other may increase more and more and never stop improving your knowledge and deepening your perception so that you can always recognise what is best. This will help you become pure and blameless, and prepare you for the Day of Christ, when you will reach the perfect goodness which Jesus Christ produces in us for the glory and praise of God.
Philippians 1 : 3-6, 8-11

Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Cardinal Schonborn sums up Medjugorje visit

Vienna-based Radio Stephansdom broadcast on January 4 (yesterday) an interview with Cardinal Schönborn on his impressions of Medjugorje.

Cardinal Christoph Schönborn in conversation with the Press Office of the Archdiocese of Vienna advocates an integration of the ‘Medjugorje phenomenon’ into the normal pastoral work of the Church. The Archbishop of Vienna made a private visit to the Marian pilgrimage site over Christmas. He wanted to see the place from which so “many positive fruits” had come.

The Archbishop of Vienna said it was necessary to defuse the ‘Medjugorje phenomenon’ “Clearly the original impulse came from the visionaries who were still children at the time of the first apparitions. Since then these unusual aspects have played only a subordinate role.” He found that Medjugorje is something like a ‘school of normal Christian life:’ “People there come to faith in Christ, to prayer, to the Eucharist, to love of neighbour, to the essence of Christianity, and to the strengthening of everyday Christian life.”

Schönborn spoke in favour of studying the ‘Medjugorje phenomenon’ in the light of Vatican II; “the sensus fidelium, the sense of faith of the baptized, plays an important role in the events at Medjugorje”.

He would not anticipate the decision of the universal Church, however, but rather follows the 1991 guidelines for Medjugorje of the former Yugoslav bishops’ conference. These have twice been confirmed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith as wise and appropriate.

The guidelines emphasized that is not confirmed that the events in Medjugorje are supernatural. The question of the supernatural would be left open. It follows that no official pilgrimages to Medjugorje are permitted. At the same time the guidelines highlighted the need for the pastoral care of pilgrims.

The bishops had been concerned, on the one hand, not to hinder the fruits and, on the other, to guard against aberrations. He personally had felt sympathetic in every respect, finding the visionaries to be “normal and good-humoured young people”.

As to what moves the pilgrims to come to Medjugorje, the Cardinal said: “The pilgrims do one thing above all, they pray. Every day thousands of people pray the Office, there is a Eucharistic adoration, the people climb Cross Mountain with its cross erected in 1933, they pray the Stations of the Cross, or they go to the Apparition Hill, and pray the Rosary.”

The Archbishop of Vienna repeatedly emphasised that the fruits of Medjugorje can be found in the wider Church. A key aspect was the prayer groups: “The first prayer meeting in Vienna was formed in the mid-80’s in the Dominican church. The church was always full, even during the summer months. The large number of young people present was impressive.” Also among the younger priests, there are many whose vocations were influenced by the experience of Medjugorje.

From Medjugorje come not only vocations but also conversions. During his visit, Cardinal Schönborn met an Italian TV presenter who experienced a profound conversion at the shrine. Medjugorje is also a “place of rediscovery of the sacrament of confession”.

The universal Church aspect was also impressive. During his brief stay the Cardinal encountered, among others, pilgrims from Italy, Germany, the United States, Lebanon and Korea, and the annual Youth Festival in July draws 60,000 young people from around the world.

In particular, the Vienna archbishop stressed the great number of humanitarian works that have emerged from Medjugorje: The Cenacolo community founded by Sister Elvira Petrozzi for drug addicted youth received the impulse for its global expansion in Medjugorje; the Mother Village has been providing a refuge for orphaned children and women victims of rape through the Balkan Wars; a meeting with a pilgrim from Malawi by a Scottish group of pilgrims led by Magnus MacFarlane-Barrow was the inspiration for Mary’s Meals, which now provides daily meals to starving children around the world

“Therefore, one must ask what the tree looks like that bears such fruit,” said Cardinal Schonborn. “In Medjugorje, many aspects correspond to a ‘grammar of Marian apparitions’: they occur in poor countries whose people are very religious. The visions are, as in Lourdes and Fatima, a very simple message given to children, but in it is to be found the kernel of the Gospel.

“Is also worth noting that Mary was venerated in Medjugorje from the beginning as the Queen of Peace - ten years before the outbreak of the Balkan wars. In Medjugorje it was clear that reconciliation with God is the precondition for reconciliation among people,” said Cardinal Schönborn.

“In the messages, few moral appeals are included; they rather emphasise the conversion of hearts, because this will then settle a lot of things through ‘inner conviction’ Maybe in the Church we should let ourselves be inspired more by Mary's pastoral approach," concluded the cardinal.

Monday, January 04, 2010

The position of the Church and Medjugorje


Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), reiterates Church position on Medjugorje...

Nothing has changed...

No decision until “apparitions” have ceased...

1991 Zadar declaration still stands...

Supernatural not confirmed and not excluded...

Pilgrimages allowed but not at diocesan level...

Pilgrims to be supported at pastoral level in Medjugorje...


Cardinal Dr Christopher Schönborn came to Medjugorje on Monday, December 28, 2009 on his private visit and stayed until January 2, 2010. During his stay in Medjugorje, he gave couple of statements to the press members. In his conversation with Max Domej, a representative of Austrian media, the cardinal was asked what has made him come to Medjugorje. Amongst other things he said:

“I know about Medjugorje for many years, not personally because I have never been here before, but in our Diocese and even farther, I do experience fruits of Medjugorje. I always used to say what Jesus has said in the Gospel: “You will recognise the tree by its fruits.” When I see the fruits of Medjugorje back at home I can only say that the tree is surely good.

Speaking, furthermore, about Medjugorje in the Church, the Cardinal added: “Supreme authority in the Church is the Holy See, the Holy Father and his Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and that is the highest authority in all of the issues of faith and morality. Supreme authority of the Church gave us clear guidelines, not directly from Holy Father himself, but from Congregation on the Doctrine of the Faith that had clearly confirmed what the bishops from Yugoslavia once said, and that undoubtedly is applicable in Medjugorje. I have always repeated that. Those texts are very much known. There are three elements that are valid still today, and I can place my visit to Medjugorje within those guidelines. In that sense, my visit is not something that is unusual at all. The Holy See, in accordance with the Statement of Bishops from 1991, says the following:

“First: Non constat de supernaturalitatae. That is the expression that is rarely used, and means that supernaturality of the events has not been confirmed, and that is classical formulation of the church doctrine. It is not said that supernaturality was excluded, but has not, or still is not finally confirmed, and all because of one simple reason that I fully support. I am the member of the Congregation on the Doctrine of the Faith, and it is understandable that I support that if we were to discuss it. Namely, as long as the phenomenon is still ongoing, it is normal that the final decision of the Church is not going to take place yet, because something like that was never done in the past before. Both in Lourdes and Fatima, the events first ceased and than the Church made its decision about that; its final decision. Sooner or later that will take place here as well, but until then we leave the Mother of God with freedom of choice.

“Second: no official pilgrimages are to be organised, which means that I can not organise pilgrimage of my diocese to Medjugorje. That is logically related to what was mentioned in the previous point. So, there is no official recognition yet, but in that formulation it is also said that supernaturality is not excluded. The Church has clearly said it is not excluded. It is not confirmed, but it is not excluded.

“Third thing that church doctrine clearly states is also in accordance to the statement of Yugoslavian Bishops, that the faithful journeying to Medjugorje require attention and pastoral care. That means that indeed pastoral care of pilgrims needs to exist, and that is the matter that many are trying to serve. Gebesaktion Wien, amongst others, who take care of pilgrims, follow them and help them even after pilgrimages. I think in that way, Medjugorje can continue well on their journey, with full trust that the Church, Mother and Teacher, in this case, is going to continue to monitor their journey. I would advise for patience. The Mother of God is so patient with us that for nearly 29 years here, in a very direct way, she is showing Her closeness and care for the parish of Medjugorje and numerous pilgrims. We can peacefully wait and have patience! Twenty nine years is a long period of time for us, but not such a long period to our God!”

source: Medjugorje parish website